Surviving Economic Crises through Education April 8, 2012Posted by Editor21C in Education Policy and Politics, Primary Education, Secondary Education, Social Justice and Equity through Education.
Tags: education and economy, philosophy of education
How does one survive an economic crisis? The answer to this question comes in a set of new essays that examine the relationships between economic crises and education. A new book – Surviving Economic Crises through Education (Peter Lang, 2012), looks at educative life from the perspective of complex and entwined material practices – sometimes unconscious. These essays suggest that one survives economic crises through education by closely examining breaks and rupture points in which new tendencies in society are disclosed and made apparent.
Education has been connected to the formations of the state and its citizens since at least Plato (1965 [360 B.C.])[i]. In these globally connected, accelerated times of instantaneous capital investment, the citizen is a product of consumerist values and state intervention in community affairs. Education is mandated to produce these citizens, and to do this, teaching and learning must presently inculcate: the requisite duties, speeds and repetitions of everyday life (in order to pay taxes), notions of services and product creation appropriate to market conditions (including efficiency markers such as linguistic and numerical skills), and robust self-building and resilience studies (effective affect-cognition, suitable for sales, interview situations and decision making under stress). Admittedly, there is another side to these through-lines in contemporary education, which have been neatly summarized by Negarestani (2011) to link education with economic crises:
As the event immanent to the polis, the citizen is the horizon whereby the trauma of the human organism is transplanted within the territorial trauma of the city and the state (p. 15).
In other words, the notion of economic crisis is a traumatising agency. In an accelerated economic situation, the likelihood of further crises and therefore increased trauma is amplified. One could, perhaps straightforwardly, relate these dispersed factors in the analysis of trauma to a type of non-representative affect relation, as Nigel Thrift (2004) has done in his analysis of cities. Yet, in order to effectively place education in the frame of an undulating economic curve of boom and bust, that perhaps goes back to the 1500s as Braudel (1967) suggests, one must take into account the notion of citizenship. The machinery of citizenship is laid out like an extended cage and shadow over and beyond the specific highs and lows of economic contextualization.
The essays in this book link economic crisis with education through the mask of apparatuses such as the citizen; with its requisite traumas detracting from understanding the ways in which teaching and learning have altered due to the crises. The set up of containment strategies for populations by power elites, who have benefitted most from economic growth, unravels when the economic situation deteriorates (see Scott, 1998). This means that educational mores, often conceptualised during a period of strong economic activity, carry on through resource retraction, and may appear as a type of nostalgia for the golden times when progress, money and social cohesion had been easier to achieve.
For example, in the USA, the boom times of the 1990s, and the ‘dot com.’ revolutions still resonate in terms of developing new economic, social and educative progress. Indeed, much of the global interest in new ways to educate for the 21st century and the future come directly from this period, with the exultation of ICT solutions to social and educative problems touted as the most efficient ways to produce learning communities (e.g. Lauder, Brown, Dillabough & Halsey, 2006). Yet educators working in poverty-stricken communities know that installing IWBs in the classroom will not immediately fix low educational expectations and achievement. Rather, one must look to the sources of the power imbalances (which are often institutionalised), and try to understand how and why they have become operative in the affective-cognitive practice of education over time:
It is here that Nietzsche speaks of a break, a rupture, a leap. Who are these beings, they who come like fate? – Some pack of blonde beasts of prey, a conqueror and master race which, organized for war and with the ability to organize, unhesitatingly lays its terrible claws upon a populace perhaps tremendously superior but still formless –. Even the most ancient African myths talk to us of these blonde men. They are the founders of the state. (Deleuze & Guattari, 1984, p. 192).
This much quoted and misunderstood reference from Nietzsche, that Deleuze & Guattari (1984) use in their analysis of the state, is relevant to questions of education and economic crises. This is because the ways in which practices are conditioned and ingrained in populations over time comes from an originatory spark of life outside of the practice (see Cole & Hager, 2010). In the case of education, the spark has come from disciplinary, religious and military forms of organization. This is why it can be so difficult to initiate and sustain creative responses to learning and change in contemporary education, as the organisational forms that educational systems carry with them, such as timetabling and lesson planning, have been rigidly determined in advance and through history by state controlled curricula mechanisms (see Land, Meyer & Smith, 2008).
These states control disciplinary mechanisms, e.g. prisons, laws and the police force, the military, and have strategic alliances with large-scale religious organizations such as the Catholic Church. The answer to the problem of state control in educative systems is not to turn over the running of schools and universities to private ownership, as the corporate sector has equally inflexible systems and hierarchies that depend on capital flows, investment strategies and shareholder value (often dependent on merging, asset savings and future(s) orientation). Rather, the ways in which the business of education should be run requires a new organisational mode to emerge, one that breaks with the state controls of the past, and allows for differentiated and local concerns to determine the ways in which teaching and learning relate to the life of the socius (Agamben, 2005) and without falling back into pure ‘economism’.
The main idea of this book is that when an economic crisis such as the recent events of the GFC unfolded in 2008 in the USA, one is given the opportunity to question and examine normatively determined forms of living that may have carried on previous to the crisis. These forms of living entwine and become other in the context of a practice such as education (see Cole, 2010). This entwinement means that the outside forces that may have started the practice, such as military organization or religious belief, become progressively hidden beneath the cloaks of educative values and stasis. In the context of an economic crisis, the cloaks are unveiled, and the ways in which the entwinements have been knotted will be revealed. This happens because the resourcing systems of education depend on surplus capital flows, and the disequilibrium of an economic crisis forms tipping points whereby different directions in practice, such as the new modes of educative organisation mentioned above, may become apparent. To this extent, an economic crisis is an opportunity for reflection and change. It is a chance for educators, students and teachers to use this moment for the purposes of coming together, breaking the blinkers and limitations that have been set up for teaching and learning in the past, and designing a new path in education.
References: Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Braudel, F. (1967). Capitalism and Material Life: 1400–1800 (M. Kochan, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row. Cole, D. R. (2010, December). The Reproduction of Philosophical Bodies in Education with Language. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42, (8), 816–829. Cole, D. R., & Hager, P. (2010). Learning-practice: The Ghosts in the Education Machine. Education Inquiry, 1 (1), 21–40. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Steem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press. Land, R., Meyer, J., & Smith, J. (2008). Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Lauder, H., Brown, P., Dillabough, J. A., Halsey, H. (Eds.). (2006). Education, Globalization and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Negarestani, R. (2011). On the Revolutionary Earth: A Dialectic in Territopic Materialism. Presentation at Kingston University of London. Plato. (1965 [360 B.C.]). The Republic (A. D. Lindsay, Trans.). London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd. Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect. Geogr. Ann., 86 B (1), 57–78.
[i] In The Republic education consists of music and gymnastics. These are the two formative aspects of Greek education.
David Cole is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at the University of Western Sydney, Australia, and a member of the Centre for Educational Research. He researches in the fields of affective literacy, multiple literacies theory (MLT) and multiliteracies, where he applies Deleuzian theory to open up and examine pertinent questions in education. He has recently been looking at the voices that influence young Muslims in Australia and immigrant family literacies.